Where are you in Implementing Enterprise 2.0
Thursday: July 5, 2007 8:48 PM
That’s a good question that many of us are afraid or unable to answer. That being said, I’ll propose one methodology for analyzing this question. I think it’s fair to say that the majority of the organization rides together, like a swarm of bees. We can make generalities about the enterprise population in order to determine where they stand on certain things. For example, I can survey my employee group and note that 89% drive to work. While 11% work from home, ride share, or use public transportation, I can still summarize that the majority of the population fall under the first category. I can then offer products and services to those that drive to work since that where my biggest bang will occur. Take a look at the following diagram and note where the majority of your employees fit into the model when thinking about Web 2.0 technologies within the enterprise.

If we randomly selected 10% of the employees and the result is that 90% have never heard of social software or don’t understand how it can be used then you can place the corporate marker all the way to the left side of the bar. On the other hand, if we have a majority of people using the product portfolio in the basic mode or utilizing the base functionality then we can place our mark toward the middle. Perhaps, the majority of users are really mature and we have replaced the Intranet and internal business processes with automated collaborative tools then we could place our mark to the right. The important point is to know where in the model you sit so you don’t waste time doing things where the value will have a minimal impact. Clearly, if you have moved beyond the point where the majority of users have never heard of you, then you don’t need to spend time on awareness programs. On the other hand, if you have very poor awareness numbers then you don’t need to spend time on advanced functionality. The organization just isn’t ready.
That’s a good question that many of us are afraid or unable to answer. That being said, I’ll propose one methodology for analyzing this question. I think it’s fair to say that the majority of the organization rides together, like a swarm of bees. We can make generalities about the enterprise population in order to determine where they stand on certain things. For example, I can survey my employee group and note that 89% drive to work. While 11% work from home, ride share, or use public transportation, I can still summarize that the majority of the population fall under the first category. I can then offer products and services to those that drive to work since that where my biggest bang will occur. Take a look at the following diagram and note where the majority of your employees fit into the model when thinking about Web 2.0 technologies within the enterprise.

If we randomly selected 10% of the employees and the result is that 90% have never heard of social software or don’t understand how it can be used then you can place the corporate marker all the way to the left side of the bar. On the other hand, if we have a majority of people using the product portfolio in the basic mode or utilizing the base functionality then we can place our mark toward the middle. Perhaps, the majority of users are really mature and we have replaced the Intranet and internal business processes with automated collaborative tools then we could place our mark to the right. The important point is to know where in the model you sit so you don’t waste time doing things where the value will have a minimal impact. Clearly, if you have moved beyond the point where the majority of users have never heard of you, then you don’t need to spend time on awareness programs. On the other hand, if you have very poor awareness numbers then you don’t need to spend time on advanced functionality. The organization just isn’t ready.
Comments (2)
Your model is a useful of thinking about these issues. I wonder to what extent you can draw people along the line without losing them on the way. My concern is that new collaborative tools are emerging and developing so quickly that the journey for some people from the left side to the right side of your model will never happen.
Posted by: Martin De Saulles on July 6, 2007 10:38
Martin has a good point. You can't keep everyone together at the same time. Most groups will seperate from the pack. So, yes let them move forward and even encourage them too but your value equation will form around mass adoption. Some will be left behind for various reasons, but again you are looking for the masses.
Posted by: RTodd on July 6, 2007 11:24